× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I want to use an SQL update statement to make a field in a file match a
field in the associated file record.  A crib sheet I found online shows 2
ways to do it:

update TableOne
    inner join TableTwo on TableOne.commonID = TableTwo.commonID 
    set TableOne.field1 = TableTwo.fieldX

Or:

update TableOne, TableTwo
    set TableOne.field1 = TableTwo.fieldX
    where TableOne.commonID = TableTwo.commonID

Is there a preference in picking one of these?  For example, the 2nd one
says "update" for both table names even though only one is actually being
updated.  Will there be some inefficiency here because of that?  Like some
unneeded lock on the file?  Or is the SQL engine smart enough that it will
"Read Everything Before Doing Anything" and handle it the same as the first?

Thanks for any insight.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.