|
I did not see much of a difference when I switched to *Anynet from raw SNA. Though I went from a 56K SDLC to two 128k FR circuits. I find that SNADS will use both routes while FTP will make use of only one. Also both AS400's at one location can connect directly to a third at a remote location instead of passing through the direct connected one. Really do not think that CPU is hit but perhaps it will drive up the IOP CPU usage. Chris Bipes -----Original Message----- I'm looking for information on SNA over IP versus native SNA in regards to performance. For example, it takes 1 hour to do a SAVRSTLIB while hooked up using native SNA, how much longer would it take to do the same SAVRSTLIB over anynet. What kind of overhead are we looking at? Any information is appreciated. Thank you.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.