|
> Jim Franz wrote: > > > > most common answer from management > > is "if it's working, why fix/change..." > > > Then James H. H. Lampert wrote: > Exactly my own reason why QuestView still runs on V2R3 (although some of > its capabilities require V4 or later), and why ThinView still runs on > V4R2, and why Wintouch still runs on V4R4. Why should we throw away > perfectly good boxes, or stop supporting perfectly good OS releases, > just because they're not state-of-the-art? James, Although not currently a customer, I appreciate your philosophy. I'll certainly refer business your way if I ever have the chance. On the other hand, IBM often seems to be on another planet when it comes to supporting their installed customer base... Regards, Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.