× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



More than you can imagine. Since there was far more S/36
installed than S/38(50 to 1, maybe much higher), you gotta
imagine many of those folks never bothered to convert to
"native".

I have several customers who never bothered and never asked
to be converted once they saw that the 400 could handle
their software "as is".

Many have converted over the years, but some still run a few applications just as they were on the S/36. The S/36 customers
are the reason the 400 exists today in my opinion.


I don't believe "anybody" including IBM, has any idea how
much S/36 code still runs. Remember the S/36 was wildly
popular in other countries other than the USA.

Of course IBM also didn't think many people were using
OV/400.

Shields, Ken wrote:


That's another reason why IBM, rushed to put the Sys/36 out in the market. The S/36 was so popular, that even to-day, on the current release of OS400, the Sys 36 Environment is still supported.

I'm very curious to know just how many companies are still using the
S36 Environment.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.