× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You can't document what you don't have. There are already the means to set up all these relationships - it's called referential integrity. Set up foreign keys in order to get the relationships.

Does any RDBMS let you put things like 1-to-n and n-to-1, etc., into the definition of a schema? Are there any that enforce those kinds of things? If so, great.

Some of what you want is already here -- use it!

But putting RI into things has implications for performance and changes in applications. RI will generate messages you need to handle, it'll actually DO things you used to do in code, etc. And every constraint is actually maintained as an additional access path, so performance could have a hit.

;-)
Vern

At 04:51 PM 6/30/2004, you wrote:
In a message dated 6/30/2004 5:15:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Jack,
>
> DSPFD, DSPFFD and DSPDBR are all fine and dandy when you want to know
> something about a single table, but when you want to know about the
> relationships _between_ tables, you need something more.
>
> Perhaps you can keep all the relationships in you head, but on systems
> with several thousand tables I know I don't recall them all. To be able
> to select a single table and see all the "related" tables is invaluable.
> Add to that the ability to select table A and table F and visually see
> the way to get from A to F is great!
>
> DSPFD, FFD and DBR are great tools, but the world has evolved, it's time
> for the iSeries community to do the same.
>
Walden,
You are 100% correct with regards to the iSeries needing to evolve but I
think the members of our community would get more results aiming there efforts at
IBM to make them require or better allow for any file relationships to be
defined within the context of the DDS or now the SQL definitions rather then
leaping onto the Microsoft band wagon to solve our problems.


The concepts of a schema have been around for a very long time so all we have
got to do together is push IBM off of the "seat down the hall"

Jack Derham
Direct Systems, Inc.
Marietta, GA



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.