RE: CPF32C6 - Trigger operation not successful.

[qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Tom Liotta)]

Jerry:

Can you elaborate a little? From what you wrote, I'm not clear on the ambiguity 
that you're trying to resolve.

In particular, what would be clarified if two messages -- one for ADDPFTRG and 
one for RMVPFTRG -- were made available? If I write a program that does 
ADDPFTRG and I use MONMSG to check for CPF32C6, don't I already know as a 
programmer that it was an ADDPFTRG issue? What value would an additional 
message give?

Naturally if I write a program that does both and I use a global MONMSG, I have 
to do a tiny extra bit of programming to know in my Std_Error section which one 
caused the problem. But somehow it feels as if you have more in mind.

Tom Liotta

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   5. CPF32C6 - Trigger operation not successful.
>      (GKern)
>
>Is there a reason why CPF32C6 is the only CPF message that can be 
>monitored for regarding the adding or removing of triggers to a physical 
>file? I find the message ambigous and it really doesn't tell me what I 
>need to know. 
>
>Why aren't  threre two additonal CPF messages, one specifically to 
>indicate that an attempted addpftrg failed (ie...the trigger has been 
>already added to the pf) and one to indicate that a rmvpftrg failed (ie... 
>the specific trigger isn't applied to the PF).
>
>Or am I missing something here? 

-- 
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertech.com


__________________________________________________________________
Switch to the New Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need. 

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp