|
They're implemented as pretty much the same thing on an iSeries. The ODBC driver should take care of the code conversion. On Wed, 12 May 2004 09:19:56 -0400, "Lokesh Gupta" <Lokesh.Gupta@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > Hi, > I used to work with Physical Files (PF) and this is first time when I > may have to work > with DB2 tables. I need to pull data from As400 to windows environment > (this could be > .net or Java) over ODBC and I have an option to use physical files or DB2 > tables. > My question is (1) which option would be better for performance pov PF or > DB2 tables. > I do not need to join lot of tables, it is just couple of tables and a > simple query. > I do not see any difference from windows side to access the data. > > Secondly, Is there any data conversion involved (db2 or PF) as I am > pulling data > from AS400 to Windows, if yes, how will that affect the performance. > > > regards, > Lokesh > > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing > list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > -- michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.