× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Personally, if I had the drive space to spare, I'd go with 100% mirroring,
rather than parity groups, the way we do on our most critical (and most
drive-failure-prone) systems, here at Touchtone. That way, to lose
anything, we'd have to lose both drives of a mirrored pair, over a span of
less time than it would take to recognize the problem, swap in a
replacement, and re-establish mirroring.

Failing that (no pun intended), I'd go with more, smaller, parity groups,
just to make them more resistant to multiple drive failures. With a single
group of six drives, any 2-drive failure would shut you down, while with
two groups of three, you would have to lose two in the same parity group,
which is statistically less likely.

--
JHHL



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.