RE: IBM iseries comparison site?? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Andy,

The 810 we quoted was the 1020 CPW. We looked at the 800 model, but elected
to remain with the 810 with the extra CPW capacity.

Thanks,
Loyd


--  
Loyd Goodbar
Programmer/analyst
BorgWarner Incorporated
ETS/Water Valley
662-473-5713
lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Nolen-Parkhouse [mailto:aparkhouse@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:24 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: IBM iseries comparison site??


> All these arguments we're persuing to back the claim that an LPAR'd 
> 810 is the best decision. We picked the smallest 810, which is I think 
> about 3x faster
> than our current 720, because of its 1050 (?) interactive CPWs in the
> Enterprise edition, LPARing capability, and Linux-hosted capability.

You may have an old quote for an 810.  At the initial announcement of the
810 there were three processors, the #2466, the #2467, and the #2469, with
CPW ratings of 1020, 1470, and 2700 respectively.  A subsequent announcement
added the #2465 with a 750 CPW, this might meet your needs at a lower price.

> Thanks,
> Loyd

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.