|
GA, If you are still interested, We have put some code snippets on our website using RCVJRNE on remote journals . http://www.abvv.be/code/en/fram099.htm luc ----- Original Message ----- From: <Ken.Slaugh@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:31 AM Subject: Re: Questions on RCVJRNE and exit program > > The RCVJRNE command itself is quite efficient. Since you haven't described > what your exit program will be doing with the journal receiver entries, > then the answer is gonna be rather vague as well. > > We have a number different processes using journal receiver entries and > processing them in batch is quite controllable with the use of RUNPTY and > TimeSlice settings. > > Another nice application is to invoke remote journals... Having a second > 400 process the journal receiver entries off-loads the RCVJRNE command > altogether. > > Good luck, you're on the right track since the files are already being > journalled. No need to impact the I/O with triggers at this point. > > Ken Slaugh (707) 795-1512 x118 > Chouinard & Myhre, Inc. > CA/400 Certified Specialist > iSeries Network/MSE Administrator > http://www.cm-inc.com/ > > > > G Armour > <garmour400m@xxxxxxx To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx > om> cc: > Sent by: Subject: Questions on RCVJRNE and exit program > midrange-l-bounces@m > idrange.com > > > 08/25/2003 12:27 PM > Please respond to > Midrange Systems > Technical Discussion > > > > > > > It appears that RCVJRNE is going to solve a dilemma for us very nicely. > However, before we go headlong into it, we'd like to have an idea as to > the additional overhead and whether user response may be impacted. > Currently, the system on which we are considering doing this has thousands > of users. Apparently, user response time is nearing an unacceptable > threshold. I know this is vague, but is all I was given for the time > being. So this will be difficult, if not impossible, for us to test in > our development environment of ten users on a more than ample system. The > file which we want to do a RCVJRNE is *already* being journaled; so the > "additional impact", as I see it, is strictly whatever the RCVJRNE & exit > program is doing. > > Before anyone asks, using a trigger program is out of the question, since > triggers are already in use for the file and we are not being allowed to > change them. > > TIA, GA > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.