RE: V5R2 Quality - Notes from the field needed

>If it is that simple (which I don't dispute) then the argument, that it
does
>not make economic sense for Microsoft to supply one, falls by the 
>wayside.

Um, Why? It makes perfect economic sense for MS to not write one. They want
you to upgrade to use these new features. I never argued that they didn't
want you to upgrade, nor did I argue they they don't "force" you to upgrade
to use new software, just that they don't force you to upgrade to run the
same software (and hardware) you always did.

-Walden

------------
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Leif Svalgaard [mailto:leif@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: V5R2 Quality - Notes from the field needed


From: Walden H. Leverich III <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >There is no reason that a driver could not be written for Win 95,
> >except that Microsoft doesn't want to.
> 
> You could always write one yourself. The interface isn't that difficult is
> is rather well documented.
> 

If it is that simple (which I don't dispute) then the argument, that it does
not make economic sense for Microsoft to supply one, falls by the 
wayside.





_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.