|
I agree with Ken, except that I think the cities should be Anaheim, San Antonio, and Atlanta. Those venues have seemed to work well in the past. The lower attendance counts make these even more feasible. Paul Nelson Arbor Solutions, Inc. 708-670-6978 Cell 708-923-7354 Home pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graap, Ken" <keg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'Midrange'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:24 PM Subject: FW: Congrads John Earl! > >Note to everyone: Please keep asking, poking, prodding and demanding from > >Me and from COMMON. We need to know what is important, and what the value > >of COMMON is perceived to be. > > > I recommend that Common come up with 5 or so hotels in cities like Las > Vegas, Minneapolis, LA, Nashville, Cincinnati, Kansas City to name a few > possibilities... Cities with good conference facilities but more reasonable > hotel / travel costs. Maybe focus on Midwest locations to reduce the "time > zone" affects of travel. > > Then just rotate among these few locations. Hotels might provide better > rates if they know that Common would be returning to their facilities every > couple of years... > > Then again ... Do you know what percentage of attendees come to a conference > based on the "Disneyland" type of attractions? Is the draw... what to do > outside the conference or what to do within the conference? > > Personally I go for the "inside stuff". If I want to play, I use my trip to > Common as a jumping off spot to a place I really want to go to and spend the > following weekend there. For example, I went to Indy, enjoyed the conference > and then flew from Indy to Pensacola to visit friends and family, returned > to Indy and flew home the following Monday using the second 1/2 of my ticket > to the conference... Worked great for me! > > That's my 2 cents worth.... > > Kenneth > > **************************************** > Kenneth E. Graap > IBM Certified Specialist > AS/400e Professional System Administrator > NW Natural (Gas Services) > keg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Phone: 503-226-4211 x5537 > FAX: 603-849-0591 > **************************************** > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Earl [mailto:john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 10:25 AM > To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' > Subject: RE: Congrads John Earl! > > > > jte > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.