Re: 48-bit RISC -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: 48-bit RISC
From: Jan Megannon <jmegannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 29 Apr 2003 21:00:33 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Dave,

Which I am well aware of. It is just that, if the RISC machines are
_true_ 64-bit, how come one could move cards from the CISC to the RISC
machines?

Cheers.

Jan.

On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 19:58, David Dunfield wrote:
> CISC machines were 48 bit
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.