× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



are all of the ibm changes open source?

thanks,

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Shannon O'Donnell
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:31 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Did IBM Hijack Apache????


I remember that IBM made several DB2/Apache enhancements and also
enhancements to work/recognize OS/400 security and for Apache to recognize
all or part of QSYS.LIB file system.  Don't remember all the details as it's
been a year or more since I looked into this.  There is a document floating
around on IBM's website on this.  You'll have to dig a bit to find it but
it's there and it contains some fairly detailed info on just what they did.

If you're really interested, I could try to find the information I have.

Shannon O'Donnell


----- Original Message -----
From: "jt" <jt@xxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: Did IBM Hijack Apache????


> | -----Original Message-----
> | [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Shields, Ken
>
> | and out systems
> | programmer, seemed to be making continual twigs to the
> | CICS command system. Occasionally, he made the mistake, of
> | printing the compile listing...LOL
>
>
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: David Gibbs [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> | At 03:28 PM 4/24/2003, you wrote:
> | >It is impossible to hijack it.  For starters, the work IBM is paying
> | >developers to do, goes right back in the pool.
> |
> | Has anyone reviewed the modifications IBM made to make Apache run on an
> | iSeries?
> |
> | Is it possible to recompile Apache on an iSeries after making your own
> | modifications?
>
> Hahaha...;-D
>
> I looked at it a li'l when Apache 2.0 came out (year-and-a-half ago?).
> Don't know details, but recall it mainly had-ta do with security
> enhancements.
>
> Dunno much about second question...  Assume if enhancements are done
"under
> the covers" rather than to the core, then recompile of changes would work
> okay. (?)
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>


_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.