|
| [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Wills, Mike N. (TC) | Seriously... I don't see IBM drastically changing the iSeries | anytime soon. | It is too stable of a system to trash with other options. I'm afraid my view is that is IS being trashed. The *nix approach of porting (what-I'd-call-beta) software to 400, rather than developing native code that's WORKS and is rock-solid-RELIABLE. And the Windoze approach of OpsNav may be partially functional (or at least more than last time I toyed with it), but not having command-line APIs for a lotta the new stuff is a critical short-coming. DDS is not being sufficiently enhanced, in favor of SQL (but hopefully NOT myBlechSQL), when IBM could easily do both with very little additional resources... Point is that it's the users of RPG, DDS, DB2, and the 5250 programming paradigm that ARE PAYING GOBS of money, to pay for all this other crap. I believe IBM will continue to reap profits, so agree they won't abandon the iSeries all that much... But a lotta Us suck hind teat when it comes to getting development resources. And I agree with Joe that a lotta this is due to 400 professionals who view these as steps in the right direction.. because they are more comfortable with C, *nix, Windoze, and/or "Open" Source methodologies than they are with native 400 programming methodologies.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.