|
Hi, Murali: I cannot come there and do it for you, if that's what you mean. :) A little busy today. :) Ummm.... Change current library to be that of the PF that you want to create the logical: CHGCURLIB LIBRARY_CONTAINING_PF Then, use ADDLFM to add a member to the LF. Specify the library where you want the LF to be created (which I have called SOMELIB) and the name of the Logical (which I have called LFNAME. Specify *CURRENT as the library name for the PF, specify the PF name (which I have creatively called PF1NAME), and specify the names of any members you want included in the view (which I have called MBR1 and MBR2 in this case). > CHGCURLIB LIBRARY_CONTAINING_PF > ADDLFM FILE(SOMELIB/LFNAME) MBR(MBRNAME) + > DTAMBRS((*CURRENT/PF1NAME (MBR1 MBR2))) What is it that you don't understand? Dennis "N, Muralidhar" <Muralidhar.N@blr.hpsglobal.com>@midrange.com on 01/13/2003 07:50:22 AM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@midrange.com To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: CL command Can you just give some more explanation to justify this? regards, Murali. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Lovelady [SMTP:dlovelady@dtcc.com] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:04 PM > To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > Subject: Re: CL command > > > Yes, that approach is sound. > > CHGCURLIB LIBRARY_CONTAINING_PF > ADDLFM FILE(SOMELIB/LFNAME) MBR(MBRNAME) + > DTAMBRS((*CURRENT/PF1NAME (MBR1 MBR2))) > > > > > > > > "N, Muralidhar" <Muralidhar.N@blr.hpsglobal.com>@midrange.com on > 01/13/2003 > 07:08:05 AM > > Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > <midrange-l@midrange.com> > > Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@midrange.com > > > To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@midrange.com> > cc: > Subject: CL command > > > > some of the CL commands do not accept *LIBL and either require a > library-name or *CURRENT to be specified. One example is ADDLFM command > while specifying PF data-members. In this case, is it safe to specify > *CURRENT, by expecting the data-file to be in current-library ? > > Since we are using members in our transaction-files, this has become an > important issue... > Kindly suggest me!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.