|
Steve, If you can't understand the importance regarding the accuracy of which PTF level you are at and the solution to a problem, you're not getting the big picture. This issue is not about being anally correct, this is about trying to solve a problem with all of the correct information being presented to those trying to solve the problem. And no, I'm not an only child. I'm an MIS professional that has had to solve problems for over 20 years and have discovered during that time that trying to solve someone's problem that has given me incorrect or misleading information is a futile exercise. Bill Steve Landess wrote: > Whatever... > > I still don't have a meaningful answer to my original question. I > don't understand why you guys are so caught up in the terminology > that I used, rather than trying to help me solve a problem. You > continue to give me a hard time about things that have absolutely no > relevance to the issue at hand. > > I appreciate your corrections, Bill. I am wrong. Dead wrong. I have > always been wrong, and I will always be wrong in the future. OK? > > But other than Jim Norbut's suggestion to change the TCP inactivity > timeout limit via CHGTCPA, (which I cannot try yet since I am work), > I haven't received any help other than people like you and Rob trying > to correct my terminology.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.