This probably has no meaning to the experts, but I thought it was interesting. Did a monster.com search on java in Michigan - 106 hits. One looked like it might be java and as/400. Did a monster.com search on iseries or AS/400 or as400 in Michigan - 32 hits. So, unscientific as this is, it seems to me there are more java jobs than as/400-anything jobs.
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com> Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org To: <email@example.com> Subject: RE: Lower End AS/400s Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:42:37 -0600 > From: Konrad Underkofler > > Joe, check out the market, people and companies vote with their feet! > This is not even debatable anymore. We are discussing the death, end or > other "marketing" problem of the AS/400. Most of the TCO stuff favoring > the 400 is silly and stupid. If there was a REAL SUBSTANTIVE DIFFERENCE > companies would pay anything to have that extra reliability! (...) > The reality says cross platform or obsolete. Even games are this way! > Where is the killer iSeries application? Most are overpriced crap. > Even the largest of the iSeries application houses JD Edwards is > moving to an open architecture. (...) > It may be business logic but it sure won't be object oriented code. Is > anyone actually doing new major development in RPG these days? What your argument comes down to is this: everybody's doing cross-platform, object-oriented development, so I better do it too. Congratulations! You are now officially part of the server farm marketing hype! But before I buy your platitudes lock, stock and barrel, let's do a little bit of due diligence: "People and companies vote with their feet." Yep. Of course, these are the same people that bought stock in companies with sock puppets. The most UNreliable marketing indicator on the planet is what the "people" are doing, because they will change direction in a flash. Ask SSA about that. "Most TCO stuff favoring the 400 is silly and stupid." Which part of uptime, reliability or scalability is stupid? None of my clients think those things is stupid. Maybe yours do. "The reality says cross platform or obsolete." Bull. Reality doesn't talk about much, and when she does, it's rarely about something as mundane as platform specificity. No, understand this single point: the people who say cross platform or obsolete are... (drum roll)... PEOPLE WHO SELL CROSS-PLATFORM. Especially consultants with cheap labor forces. Teach 'em once, pay 'em $25/hr, charge $75/hr. What a world. "Even games are this way!" I have to disagree with this statement. Because there are tons of games released "for Playstation Only" or only for consoles, not PC. "It may be business logic but it sure won't be object oriented code." You say that as if it's a negative. Object oriented code isn't somehow intrinsically better than procedural code. In some cases, where code reuse is important, OO can be a benefit. In other cases, such as those where the rules change often or need to be driven by a database, procedural code, especially the kind you can write with ILE RPG, is just as powerful, and often with a much quicker time to market, due to the heavy startup costs of a true OO project. I guess we disagree on what's important. Somebody has convinced you that "object oriented" and "cross platform" are somehow requirements for business development. I continue to argue that such standards in general benefit the consulting firms far more than they benefit the end user. Perhaps I've overlooked some fact, but in general, I can't agree with any of your assertions. Joe _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-Lfirstname.lastname@example.org Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
_________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact