|
On Fri, 02 August 2002, midrange-l-request@midrange.com wrote: > For technical reasons, a SAVSYS requires a restricted state, and > I do not > see IBM changing this requirement. High end customers indicate > that they > can do a SAVSYS, omitting user profiles and config in under five > minutes. I've always felt that IBM made a mistake in naming this command (SAVSYS). Something more descriptive such as SAVQSYS or SAVSYSLIC would've made its purpose more intuitive. I'm not sure what name would really be best, but I'm pretty sure SAVSYS isn't it. Particularly for less technical sites and newbies, SAVSYS seems to get mentally equated to 'Save system', 'full system save' and SAVE menu option '21. Entire system', even if it's only perception. The purpose of restricted state then becomes vague (not that it's absolutely clear otherwise). Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
