|
That would only affect you if you had something like a CLP program with type CLP38 instead of CLP. The attribute on the files would make no difference for PF, LF etc. There are some differences between PRTF38 and PRTF though. ...Neil "Dan Bale" <dbale@samsa.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: File attributes PF38, LF38, PF38-DTA, PF38-SRC Neil, I'm not sure if I'm mismembering this, but if any object references are qualified with library names in DDS source, I believe the syntax is object.library for s38 types vs. library/object for as400 native types. - Dan Bale (I am *NOT* "Dale" http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html ) Neil Palmer wrote: Just an old S/W package and didn;t want to recreate all the files. True, it doesn't affect anything, but there's a certain perception if you look at the library and see file types PF38, LF38 etc. onstead of PF, LF.. ...Neil
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.