|
I here you. Yet it seems that the time to activate things could be insiginificant for longer running commands. And other once-in-a-while things aren't going to be too badly affected by the startup process. The convenience of commands, with prompting, etc., weighs heavily in their favor for a lot of things, I think. The main issue might be file opens, but you COULD write these without a full close, I'd think, and with a special "last time" parameter to do the full close. Maybe a hidden first parameter in commands that both use the same CPP. At 07:57 AM 7/3/02 -0400, you wrote: >My CPP's are already ILE routines. It's just that I keep thinking that it >would be nice if there was some way for me to bind these commands >themselves into other ILE routines. I guess I could ignore the command >itself and bind in the CPP instead but once you get used to using a >command, it becomes second nature to use it directly. > >Bill
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.