|
From: Joe Pluta > Yes, my statement does confuse the two terms. Perhaps because it's > confusing, or perhaps because the terms are sort of inseparable. If I have > an SQL program on OS-A and I want it to talk to DBMS-1, then I need driver > OS-A/DBMS-1. In order to run with DBMS-2, I need driver OS-A/DBMS-2. To > run on another platform, I need ALL the drivers for the various target > databases for that platform. > > Am I starting to understand? Based upon the post that I extracted your statement from, I think you understand perfectly well. :-) As you've already stated, ODBC drivers are not portable across OS's. But that is not the same thing as saying that SQL isn't portable. Regards, John Taylor
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.