Re: Samba (was: OS-X vs. Windows) -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Samba (was: OS-X vs. Windows)
From: Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:05:51 -0600 (CST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I believe that Samba is already supported on AIX.  Therefore, it may
very well run on PASE under OS/400 without any changes...   I wish I had
the resources to try this out :)

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Simon Coulter wrote:
>
> Perhaps an AS/400 port of Samba would be the go?  I know it would suffer in
> performance being implemented above the MI but surely it couldn't be any
> slower than NetServer itself?  And if it supported any SMB client then that
> may mitigate the performance aspect.  Who's interested?
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.