|
John: On Thu, 22 November 2001, jpcarr@tredegar.com wrote: > If my program was compiled by QGOD and Adopts authority, It should have > the same ability > and behavior regardless of who the authorized user id is running that > program and > regardless of what object it touches in the Integrated(?) File System. As with the inet_addr() API, behavior of read(), write(), etc., is consistent with Unix, AFAIK; i.e., they do not propagate adopted authority. Perhaps the real problem is simply that we have not been given native OS/400 APIs as an alternative. ALL we got were Unix-like. While this makes porting much easier and more predictable, it does not give as much incentive to develop for OS/400 (IMHO). How difficult could it be to go that additional step? Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
