× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I will be interested in Al's presentation.

Dare


----- Original Message -----
From: "Graap, Ken" <keg@nwnatural.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Cc: <fiona.fitzgerald@notes.royalsun.com>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: SAVCHGOBJ


> Fiona -
>
> I agree with Al. Always save access paths...
>
> You should investigate using the Save While Active feature of SAV/RST to
> reduce your application offline time while doing backups too.
>
> I B/U over 300GB a night using BRMS/400, our 3590 tape drives and the Save
> While Active feature. Our production applications are only unavailable to
> users for about 25 minutes a day and that is at 3AM... The end user hardly
> even notices the downtime and I backup everything I need for a quick and
> easy recovery.
>
> Al has a great presentation on Save While Active that I bet he would send
> you, if you asked nicely...
>
> Kenneth
> --
> ********************************
> Kenneth  E.  Graap
> IBM Certified Specialist
> AS/400 Professional
> System Administrator
> NW Natural - Information Services
> System Services
> Phone 503 226 4211 X5537
> FAX   603 849 0591
> keg@nwnatural.com
> ********************************
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fiona.fitzgerald@notes.royalsun.com
> [mailto:fiona.fitzgerald@notes.royalsun.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:02 PM
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: SAVCHGOBJ
>
>
>
>
> We backup changes , without the access paths during the week, & do a full
> SAVLIB *ALLUSR at weekends with access paths.
> Should the nightly save changes job save access paths just like the weekly
> full saves ?
>
> We've been using this strategy to minimise tape & offline batch-window
> usage for 5 years, but I'm wondering if this is wrong for effective
> disaster-recovery, when it slows down to rebuild them. Our application
> files rarely change, only the pgms get upgraded weekly. Does anyone have
an
> opinion on the pros & cons of this ?
>
> Fiona
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.