RE: CLRLIB QRPLOBJ?? (was Re: IPL regains storage.......but)

[neilp@xxxxxxxxxxx]

What you are seeing are the objects that would be used if you ran RMVPTF.
As you are permanently applying the PTF's these objects are no longer
needed, and can be cleared.

...Neil





"Chuck Lewis" <clewis@iquest.net>
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
2001/08/24 22:08
Please respond to midrange-l


        To:     <midrange-l@midrange.com>
        cc:
        Subject:        RE: CLRLIB QRPLOBJ?? (was Re: IPL regains 
storage.......but)


I would definitely agree with this statement Tom.

With my perm applying PTF's to free up disk space and prep for an OS
upgrade, I saw MANY PTF related objects created in QRPLOBJ and I would be
very leery of blowing these away...

I had never noticed this in QRPLOBJ before but had noticed the usual
program
or display file objects due to compiling stuff in use at the time...

JMHO,

Chuck

Tom wrote:

<As has been mentioned elsewhere on this list, a CLRLIB of QRPLOBJ can be
trouble. Objects should not be removed from QRPLOBJ unless you know what
they are. The system does some of its own work through this library and
can
be disrupted if some of its objects disappear.

On most days at most sites, there's probably no problem. But blanket
CLRLIB
should be avoided.

Tom Liotta>