|
Dan, This is not meant as a slam. But, with all of these old releases of OS/400 your company doesn't really sound 'bleeding edge' to me. I am only mentioning this because certain versions of 'beta' OS/400 have been known to put marker ptf's similar to this. Might you have beta'ed V4R3? Rob Berendt ================== A smart person learns from their mistakes, but a wise person learns from OTHER peoples mistakes. "Bale, Dan" <D.Bale@handleman.c To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> om> cc: <neilp@dpslink.com> Sent by: Subject: Rebuilding PTF indexes (was RE: V3R2 LIC) midrange-l-admin@mi drange.com 08/14/2001 01:04 PM Please respond to midrange-l Neil, where is this documented? What releases is this available for? I've got a similar situation with a V4R3 box whose DSPPTF 5769999 screen starts out with the following column of PTF IDs: RE98316 RE98273 RE98144 RE98143 RE98142 QLL2924 MF20589 MF20583 MF20515 Nobody's ever been able to tell me what the RE entries are, but there are no TL entries and I find it hard to believe that we've been running this thing in production since who knows when without any cumes installed. FWIW, everything is either permanently installed or superseded. Dan Bale IT - AS/400 Handleman Company 248-362-4400 Ext. 4952 D.Bale@Handleman.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -------------------------- Original Message -------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: neilp@dpslink.com [SMTP:neilp@dpslink.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:41 AM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: V3R2 LIC More likely the PTF index has somehow been destroyed. Try this (in a restricted state): DLTF FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF4) DLTF FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF3) DLTF FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF2) DLTF FILE(QUSRSYS/QAPZPTF) CALL PGM(QPZSYNC) PARM(C) ...Neil Douglas Handy <dhandy1@bellsouth.net> Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com 2001/08/14 11:09 Please respond to midrange-l To: midrange-l@midrange.com cc: Subject: Re: V3R2 LIC Pete, >when I did a DSPPTF 5763999, it came up with no PTFs I just checked a 200-2031 machine at V3R2, and 5763-999 definately showed a long list of PTF's. The highest numbers on that particular box were TL98139 and MF18809. I don't know if MF18809 was part of the CUME or not. The highest number for 5763-SS1 was TC98139. All of these were permanently applied. There were numerous superceded TL's and TC's before them. I believe 98139 was the last CUME issued for V3R2. Did the account never load a CUME? That's scary. At least they aren't on V3R1 without a CUME... Doug _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.