|
Actually, these are for those new frozen PB&J sandwiches we've all seen advertised on TV. And it DOES meet the requirements of a patent. Eg: Unique and non-obvious. Unique key part is that the peanut butter encapsulates the jam/jelly. Therefore not allowing the jam/jelly to soak into the bread. Therefore making it possible to store the sandwich for more than 10 minutes without having mush. In this day of "Lunchables", why has it taken so long for someone to come out with a Peanut butter & jelly sandwich? Because of the mush problem. And they have solved it. Doesn't that deserve a patent? Bob -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Peter Dow Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:15 PM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: open source. was Closed system (was: PC connection via twinax ?) Hey people, watch what you eat: "Yes, folks, Menusaver holds the patent, awarded in December 1999, for the "sealed crustless sandwich." Patent No. 6,004,596 states: "The sandwich includes a lower bread portion, an upper bread portion, an upper filling and a lower filling between the lower and upper bread portions, a center filling sealed between the upper and lower fillings, and a crimped edge along an outer perimeter of the bread portions for sealing the fillings therebetween . . ." Bay City Times news section of Michigan Live (www. mlive.com/ news/) on Jan. 20 Before you bite, send your royalties to... <snip>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.