|
And lest ye think I'm not being as impartial as possible here, I did some research on the block INSERT technique, and can report that it greatly increases performance. By adding a blocking factor of 10, I reduced the SQL processing time from 40 seconds to 6 seconds for inserting 100,000 records. Implementing this technique involves using a multiple occurence data structure. The problem, of course, is that you have to have blocks of records to insert, and normal transaction processing doesn't work that way, but in those cases where it's appropriate, it certainly makes SQL process better. Unfortunately, I didn't come across an analogous operation for updates, so the FETCH/UPDATE numbers still stand. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Pluta > 100,000 WRITE operations took 7 seconds > 100,000 SQL INSERT INTO ... VALUES operations took 40 seconds
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.