|
Neil, I suppose duration is like field positions, end - begin +1 = length If I made an adjustment for 1 that would bring it to 12-31-1899 as the 0 base date and day 1 would be 01-01-1900, but that seems a little convoluted. Neil Palmer wrote: > > So could the 2 day difference in the calculations be because someone isn't > counting 1900 & 2000 as leap years ? > > ...Neil > > "James W. Kilgore" <eMail@James-W-Kilgore.com> > > The following gave me 1899-12-30 as the base date > > H > DCURRDATE S D DATFMT(*ISO) INZ(D'2001-03-18') > DBASEDATE S D DATFMT(*ISO) INZ(D'2001-03-18') > C CURRDATE SUBDUR 36968:*D BASEDATE > C DSPLY BASEDATE > C SETON LR > > Chris Beck wrote: > > > > Can someone tell the formula to convert 20010318 to 36968. > > > > This would be just like the DATEVALUE in Excel. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.