× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: ACCPTHSIZ parmeter, is it realy critics?
  • From: Dimitri Efimov <defimov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:57:09 -0500

As I sad befoure, we had a 40 min. sustantion of all process which had to
add new records to DB in our 740. (all QDBSRV jos were in LCKW).
Finaly, after 1 month of the war (IBM support stuff was included also), the
sistem won and decided to switch to our new 840 system. The sistem is stable
now, and are in the investigation process. IBM found that we had ACCPTHSIZ
set in 4GB (now is 1T) in our old system. From IBM point of view this is the
cause.

Can somebody tell if it realy critic? We checked all our files and no one is
bigge than 4GB.

Thanks 

Dmitri
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.