× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: A boost for Linux on the 400
  • From: D.BALE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:48:00 -0500

Hey Don, better get that asbestos suit on pronto!

While I believe that the threat mentioned by the security analysis in the
article was worst-case scenario, it just gives the IT world one more reason to
consider non-Microsoft OS'es.  (And, no, I don't trust anything Microsoft says
anymore.)

Acknowledging that Windows is a poor excuse for an operating system, if I had
my druthers, we'd all be using OS/2, but I won't go there.  <sob>

I can't answer your question as it relates to Linux, so this is "In My
Uninformed Opinion-Guess", but if IBM ever gets Linux to install on an
iSeries/400 without OS/400 (isn't that the goal?), it seems to me that you
lose the cost of OS/400 and all of the other LPPs; now you're just paying for
the hardware, which gets the total initial cost into a competitive range and,
perhaps, TCO is an outright bargain (heh!).

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952

-------------------------- Original Message --------------------------

On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Neil Palmer wrote:

> This is the type of Microsoft "publicity" that just may lead more people
> to look at replacing Windows with Linux - hopefully on a 400 !

OK, now, maybe I'm not seeing something here, but....   It's my
understanding that in effect Linux runs as a symbiant on the 400 and that
it runs on top of OS/400 or in effect requires OS/400 to be installed as
the base/hose o/s.  Which means that you have to have os/400 to run
linux...which is to say that Linux is NOT the base o/s on the box.

I think this is correct so far, and I'm sure I'll get a flood of email if
I'm wrong.

What the above scenerio begs is the question of "why would ANYONE buy a
AS/400 just to run Linux"?  Guys, you can get a raid-5/mirrored pentium
server to load linux on for a FRACTION of the price of a 400....
So, why would someone spend the extra bucks for the 400 just to load linux
on it?  I know.  I'm getting a pentium box now to load linux/apache on at
the office here...then my systems will be almost complete (NT, Linux, DOS,
Windows,NT server, (Super Secret system from Rochester MN that IBM
sells)...only thing left I might want would be a MPE box...:)

What don't I see here that I missing?

Don in DC (bracing for onslaught of flames...:)
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.