|
Oops, missed this question. > In all reality, how many people actually use DTDs? I don't know. But I would say anyone who likes to take the easy approach to programming and would rather let a tool (in the software sense of the word 'tool') do most of the work will be using DTD's - even for simple XML streams. Using a third party XML parser (for instance the IBM one) gives me these things 1. It checks for me to see if XML - without DTD's - stream is well formed 2. It validates for me the XML stream against the DTD, if there is one 3. It parses the XML into a nice, easy to traverse object tree All that's left for me to do is read the actual data, not the stream in the raw, but the actual element data. All the hard work is done for me - just what I like ;-) --phil +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.