× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: eRPG; where are my images
  • From: booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:16:12 GMT

Hans, I work with all sorts of users.  286 & up, Linux, Apple, Windows, 
and even DOS.  (Ever see "Concurrent DOS"?  Now there's a really great 
truly multitasking operating system!)  These people all have other things 
they do which is not computer related.  They already understand 8.3.  Then 
they learn about long file names, etc. and we get 

Them: "How come I can't see my picture?"
Me:  "what is the name of your picture?" 
Them: "Its 'Jenny & mom  at the beach July 6th'" 
Me:"Oh? Is it a jpg or a gif?" 
Them: "Huh?"

The painful truth is that just because its a rule doesn't mean it happens. 
 (btw, you noticed the two(2) spaces between "mom" and "at"?)  8.3 ain't 
pretty but it works everywhere every time.


_______________________
Booth Martin
Booth@MartinVT.com
http://www.MartinVT.com
_______________________




boldt@ca.ibm.com
Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
06/26/2000 08:44 AM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L

 
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: eRPG; where are my images



Booth wrote:
>My experience is that nothing is lost and universality is won when one
>stays to an 8.3 naming convention.  Everyone's software understands
>myfile.txt and mypic01.jpg.  Longer names are nice but mixing cases,
>inserting blanks, and hidden extensions just cause unneeded troubles,
>especially when the Internet is still so new.  As the world begins moving
>to the new Internet Appliances and hand-helds we are going to see more 
and
>more browser incompatibility imho, so staying with the lowest common
>denominator makes sense unless there is a compelling argument to the
>contrary.

Yucch!  Does anyone still use DOS these days?

In the current thread, we are discussing stuff like
how browsers request files and how servers serve
them.  The syntax of URL's and URI's is well defined,
and any piece of software that doesn't handled them
properly is defective, not just the "lowest common
denominator".  The fact that some part of a URI sort
of looks like part of a file name on some system is
totally irrelevant.

(For example, someone else noted how MSIE is buggy
in that it accepts URI's with embedded blanks.)

Cheers!  Hans

Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
+---




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.