Re: AS400 user password

Dan,

"Bale, Dan" wrote:

> Ed, I'm really not into beating dead horses (though many would say this
> horse ain't dead yet <g>).  I acknowledge that all developers make mistakes,
> so I am not one to cast stones.
>
> However, I _am_ concerned with IBM's *seemingly* lack of speedy resolutions
> to security exposures that others have said have been brought to IBM's
> attention.  I don't know how long IBM had this information before the uproar
> of last week, but only a few days later, you came forward with the PTF
> solutions.

I don't think this is a fair read of the situation.   The first that many 
(*ALL?)
of us heard of this was last Monday, and now we have PTF's this Monday.  I think
IBM should be commended for a fast response.  (It should be noted that Gary
Guthrie said that he had "mentioned" it to an undisclosed IBMer some time in the
past, but I don't beleive that anyone ever opened about an APAR or other 
official
report prior to publication on the MI list last week).  A week's time for three
PTF's is not what I would term "IBM's *seemingly* lack of speedy resolutions".


>  It appears that many of the elite group of MI experts that
> subscribe to the MI400 list have grown weary of waiting for IBM to even
> acknowledge that they know what they're talking about.  They appear to be
> genuinely concerned for the AS/400 community, whereas IBM's security team
> *appears* to be in the "security by obscurity" camp.

Gene Gaunt is a talented programmer and writes some great stuff and I don't wish
to bash him, but IMHO it was a mistake to post the code the way he did.  I would
think that a genuine concern for security would dictate that an Securty APAR
would be opened prior to posting this very serious exposure publicly (And as a
programmer, wouldn't you rather be told personally about your bugs before they
get posted on an internet forum?).  During the time that it took IBM to respond,
we were all hanging out there with our passwords available to anyone with
programmer abilities and a subscription to the MI list.

I don't think that IBM is ignoring security or putting their head in the sand,
they just got blind-sided on this issue.  What I'd like to see is a reporting
infrastructure that will allow word to get to the right people in a timely
fashion, so that IBM (and all of us!) doesn't get blind-sided again.  If the
reporting mechanizm for security breaches is lacking, then I want to see it
fixed.  Security is important enough to deserve a fast path through the support
infrastructure, and a more visible and easier to use reporting mechanizm for
security may have got word to the right people at the right time.

jte


--
John Earl                               johnearl@400security.com
The PowerTech Group                     206-575-0711
PowerLock Network Security              www.400security.com
--


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---