× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Discontinuance of support for the *M36
  • From: boothm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 00:18:25 GMT

Your comments interest me.  I have started working with a small shop that 
has had their Sys/36 running with code that was untouched after 1984 and 
1988.  In October they ordered a new AS/400 and their Business Partner 
installed it with the old code and *M36 then a few months later moved it 
all over to the AS/400 side running in Sys36 mode.  The entire package was 
reasonably priced, and while I didn't understand the two step change-over, 
it has proven very successful.  The installation was on-time and 
on-budget.  In today's world of slipping deadlines, scope-creep, budget 
overruns, and train wrecks this is a pretty good case for IBM's track 
record regarding compatibility.  In my opinion.
_______________________
Booth Martin
booth@martinvt.com
http://www.MartinVT.com
_______________________




"M. Lazarus" <mlazarus@ttec.com>
Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
05/03/2000 08:22 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L

 
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        Discontinuance of support for the *M36


  It would seem that IBM is again looking to abandon the small business 
customer in the IBM Midrange arena.  I am referring to the apparent 
discontinuance of support for the *M36.

This move is puzzling for two reasons:

1)  The costs to IBM for supporting this feature must be relatively low, 
since it's considered to be stable.

2)  The "experiment" to push S/36 customers over to the AS/400, when the 
AS/400 first came out, failed miserably.  Why would IBM want to go through 

that embarrassment again?

  The primary impact of this move is going to be to small businesses, the 
ones that have managed to retain their functional S/36 code.  They are 
traditionally the ones to be the "least squeaky" wheel.

  Any thoughts?

  -mark


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.