× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Compatibility across our whole range
  • From: boldt@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:35:52 -0500



Roger wrote:
>I hope you forgot a smiley! Listen to what you're saying!
>You make it sound as though enterprise operating systems were the
commodity
>toilet paper is!
>
>Dr Frank already promised us that Java would provide souce compatibility
>across our whole range. Does IBM so desparately need a backup bet to that
>promise that it proposes Linux from ThinkPads to 390s as its Next Big
Thing?
>
>Hans, you're a respectable voice of reason. Please tell us the aliens
don't
>have you in a cocoon!
>
>rp (what's the emoticon for perplexed!)

No need for an emoticon - your words already express your
perplexity.

My comments on this subject are strictly my own opinion
and not based on any inside information, of which I know
little to begin with.

Remember SAA?  That was an attempt to define a set of
interfaces that worked across our entire hardware line.
Theoretically, it would have been possible to be able to
port S/W right across the hardware range.  It was doomed
to fail, of course, since each platform had their own
favorite API's.

I view the Linux initiative as a something like SAA.  The
difference is that this time, the standards are external
and already accepted by a large programming community.
No inter-divisional infighting can change Linux's
importance.  It is bigger than SAA.  And bigger than Java.

Look, I like Java.  I think it's a good language and I
hope it achieves success.  But face it, it hasn't
exactly changed the computing world the way Linux (and
other open-source s/w) has.  But I see the two as
complementary.  Java runs on Linux.  Java is good for big
applications.  But systems programming needs something
lower level like C.  Likewise, there are other languages
better suited to quick-and-dirty tools.  Java alone isn't
going to achieve full machine independence.

Cheers!  Hans

Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.