× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: CURRENT Y2K & OS400 CUM AND/OR PTF
  • From: bvining@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 22 Dec 99 11:19:45 CST

Dare,

There are PTFs in common between SF99200 and C8314370; but SF99200
has several Y2K PTFs that are not in C8314370 and C8314370 has many
non-Y2K PTFs that are not in SF99200.

To see where the two sets of PTFs diverge (for Y2K) see Informational
APAR II11543.  In the rightmost column of the report is the quarter
that the PTF became available and the CUM package the PTF was included
in.  You will find most of the 1999 Y2K PTFs are not in C8314370.

Bruce

>
>Anyone, is SF99200 part of C8314370?
>
> Dare
>


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.