Exactly Nina. I way, way underestimated the value of a central point of
control for version levels, software support, security issues, and data
repositories. I also underestimated the permutations available to muck up
an application when you have to deal with several versions of Windows 95,
a version of Windows 98, and 2 or more versions of Windows NT.
Add in the problems of applications being physically distant and not being
easy to manage or update and I quickly came to understand that a
client/server application with 300 screens would become a nightmare if in
fact a full installation could ever even be accomplished in a reasonable
amount of time.
I am still excited about client/server because it is so effective for the
user, but it is not an easy solution.
In <374B673B.120AE7BA@datadesigninc.com>, on 05/25/99
at 10:15 PM, nina jones <ddi@datadesigninc.com> said:
>> > I like Visual Age RPG for client/server but after using it a while I now
>> > know why client/server never got off the ground.
>why?? the difficulty in keeping everything in sinc?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
boothm@ibm.net
Booth Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
