|
This is no big deal, but: For objects that you KNOW you will never use, the most efficient compression is DLTOBJ. But for all the objects you THINK you will never use, why not CPROBJ? And of cause you never compress objects that are used regulary, so the big *DOWNTHETOILET situation will only happen when you do the CPROBJ which can be scheduled to low workload periods. A good guess on objects you will probably never use is those object you have never used for maybe half a year (system objects including QSYS) or half a year + an end of fiscal year (for application objects). It's easy - simply a parameter on the command. Admitteded it's not a big part of total objects on the system, but it's also not a big task to do it once or twice a year. ---------- > Fra: Al Barsa, Jr. <barsa2@ibm.net> > Til: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Emne: Re: Object Compression > Dato: 30. april 1999 02:32 > > At 05:44 PM 4/29/99 -0500, you wrote: > >>Do you have any experience with the CPROBJ command? If yes, please > >>share it with us. > > >>4. What is the 'dark side' of this command? > > It can cause SYSTEMPERFORMANCE(*DOWNTHETOILET). > > Al +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.