Re: subfile processing--readc & sflnxtchg -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I've used them with no undesirable side affects.  I've never heard of any
cons.

Brian Johnson
Help/Systems, Inc.
brian.johnson@helpsystems.com
www.helpsystems.com
(612) 563-1627





uucp@UUCP1.MCS.NET on 02/10/99 11:01:06

Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com

To:   IDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
cc:    (bcc: Brian Johnson/HelpSystems)

Subject:  subfile processing--readc & sflnxtchg




I'm interested in getting  opinions on the use of READC and SFLNXTCHG in
processing subfiles.  I was trained to avoid both, but I know the opcode
and
the keyword are available and many people who don't have horns and tails or
drool use them.  I assume there are pros and cons.







+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.