× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Wed, 12 Aug 1998 17:49:52 -0400, Mark Lazarus <mlazarus@ttec.com> wrote:

>Gord,
>
>At 10:50 AM 8/11/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>On the CISC box, we used to determine the number of records which would fit
>>into a 32k buffer and use this in an OVRDBF to optimize the number of
>>records read per physical I/O.  The buffer size changed on the RISC boxes
>>but I can't find the note I made on the new size.  Would someone refresh my
>>memory please?
>
> 128K.
>
> -mark
>
Thanks Mark.  For some reason I thought it was higher but a search through
some old messages in comp.sys.ibm.as400.misc shows this to be the
consensus.  Faulty memory again I guess.

Gord

-- 
Gord Hutchinson
TST Overland Express
ghutchinson@tstoverland.com
905-212-6330
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.