|
boothm@ibm.net wrote: > > wow! thanks. I did not know this. Probably I should have, but didn't. > Would UPDATE work the same way? So that one can: > > C KeyFld UPDATRecordName 99 > C 99KeyFld WRITERecordName 99 > Those aren't valid usages of the op codes - the update might be useful, but having the keyflds in the write would be redundant - the fields have to be in the record format anyway. Regards, Rick +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.