|
> Chris, I'd like to start by stating that you do provide very lucid explanations. I'm going to have to be more careful with my wording as to more accurately convey my thoughts and try not to be like the perpetrator in the movie "Seven" just pouring my thoughts out in no discernible order. ;-) > > > IBM won't be making a play for the consumer market. There's no money in it > unless they get into consumer software and IBM isn't likely to do that. I don't think that IBM is that adverse to the consumer market. With stated plans to derive an ever increasing portion of revenue from software, an opportunity to engage in an OS war may prove very lucrative. Even with the hardware at a penny profit. Look what it did for a company that wasn't even in the hardware business <g>. > I am not exactly sure what picture you are painting. Java allows > applications to be written independant of what platform they are running > on. The Java workstation would have some very simple built in > configuration to handle the display and keyboard. PCs running various OSs > would use the same configurations they use now, but one of the > applications they are running would be a Java Virtual Machine that would > interpret the application shipped to it from the network and make requests > of the local OS. Nothing new here. The point I was trying to make is that certain utility functions now incorporated into an OS could be replaced by a utility purchased on the open market. In my example, the "Device Manager" then could behave/look/feel totally different from one shop to the next. The same Pandora's box that would allow the application market an even playing field would also be open to system level utilities. My question is how do we deal with as many device manager et. al. applications should they proliferate like word processors? The commercial market is a lot of boxes. Currently the same ones being sold on the consumer market. Just by looking around my client sites and seeing who actually "needs" a PC, I would venture that 1/2 could be NC's, maybe more. And if a browser IS your desktop, that's a big hit to Microsoft. Unless it's their browser. Maybe our difference in view could be that I envision a JVM as more than just a browser with the ability to serve up applications. JAVA applications IMO could grow to the point that, like drivers provided by the component manufacturer, your CPU/MB provider could be the issuer of a kernel and at this point the questions would be "Who's Microsoft?" I feel that this is the scenario that has Microsoft doing what they can to win the browser/JAVA war. > Now, let's suppose Microsoft controls the display. What OS will the > display require? Since MS has done such things before, isn't it likely to > assume that they will implement controls which give NT servers an > advantage over the AS/400? This question also reinforces my view that the desktop war was not "over" in 1996. If the browser is the desktop, the battle is still raging. Imagine if you will that one could purchase a PC and along with the choice of video cards, drive capacity, etc. you also had a check list of files systems (FAT, NTFS, HPFS) which are JAVA based and independent of OS. You don't need an OS to deliver video, the JVM would handle the driver. The browser (anyone's browser) would be your desktop. A JAVA based keyboard handler? Sure why not. All these would erode the OS. Server side, without the Microsoft logo in someone's face all day long at the desktop, Microsoft might actually have to compete on merit. And yes, if Microsoft has the OS, you can bet they'll try to make you have all the other services, including the browser, with their logo. P.S. In your case I'll cut back on the cheeky comments. Or use more emoticons. I was just kidding out porting OS/400 to the desktop. It does fine right where it's at. Except for when my PC locks up and I'm giving it the three finger salute, I can't help but wish a little... +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.