Re: RUMBA v CA -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

At 08:12 AM 2/11/98 +1100, Karl Heyer wrote:
>What are the advantages of changing from CA95 to RUMBA? Presently we are SNA
>over twinax. We will be changing to TCP/IP LAN. Our application is JDE.

Karl,

I've not used Rumba in a couple of years, but the main difference I saw was 
that the fonts in Rumba were much less readable than those in CA. Otherwise, 
the functionality is similar. IP works great. It's quick, reliable and low 
overhead. Native printer support is coming. SNA file transfer works now.

Pete

Pete Hall
peteh@inwave.com 
http://www.inwave.com/~peteh/

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.