Re: WRKACTJOB

[DennisLovelady@xxxxxxxxx (Dennis Lovelady)]

Hi, Doug:

Well, that *has* to have something to do with it... but you tell 
us: is that the main difference?  Are CPU loads, number of attached
users, number of batch jobs, number of active writers, ...  are all
these things equal on the two systems?

Food for thought


Dennis Lovelady               Simpsonville, SC
life: dennis@lovelady.com     work: dennis.lovelady@kemet.com
www: http://cybercity.piedmont.net/~dennis
ICQ UIN: 5734860   




Doug Barnes <Doug.Barnes@RHTelCo.Com> on 02/03/98 11:13:58 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> @ INTERNET
cc:  
Subject: WRKACTJOB

We have a 510 that takes 10-15 seconds to respond after a
WRKACTJOB command.
We also have another 510 (same processor) that only takes 2 or less.
The one that takes a long time shows 27000+ jobs when a WRKSYSSTS
is run. The other on only has 2700 jobs. Is that the main difference?


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---