× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: QCMDEXC question
  • From: "Joe Teff" <jteff19@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 12:18:58 -0600

>> Kilgore writes:
>> 
>> ----------------quote--------------
>> A few years back there were trade rag articles about REXX ("The OS without a
>> brain" or some such) and for those of us that have a S/36 or S/38 background 
>we
>> are accustomed to writing some form for procedural driver to a command that
>> executes the REAL programs.  Some may use REXX in the same context as I'm 
>sure
>> the majority use CL, while the C programmers out there are probably 
>scratching
>> their heads wondering "What do we need another language for?"
>> 
>> It may be time for us to look at another "callable" for the command processor
>> and CL may not be the best suited for the ILE environment.
>> ---------------unquote-------------
 
> Peter Coffin writes:
> You're not the only one who's using REXX by any stretch of the imagination.
> Programs that report on other objects on the system that are going to become
> hardcopy reports are so easy to write in REXX. The ability to pass commands
> directly down to CL, default output to a spooled file, and REXX's wonderful
> string handling features... Sure, the same thing could be done in RPGLE, but
> for me, doing it in REXX takes about half the time.
> 
> I would like to see the ability to create REXX *MODULEs and bound REXX
> programs, though. They wouldn't have to be actual compiled programs; a wrapper
> of code that starts the REXX interpreter to execute the REXX procedure that's
> imbedded in the object (just copy it from the source member when building
> the *MODULE or *PGM) would do nicely. The reason to imbed it is that then the
> execution doesn't depend on the source member staying exactly where the *PGM
> expects it. It moves with the object, and is saved and restored with the 
>object.

As long as were brainstorming here, why not just include the REXX in the RPG 
code with a
compiler directive to start and stop:

   +/STRREXX
    REXX instructions
   +/ENDREXX

I still would like to see the same capability for CL.

Joe Teff
QDS
Bloomington, MN
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.