RE: CA/400 Woes

David

At 06:53 PM 11/23/97 -0600, you wrote:
>At 11:04 PM 11/23/97 UT, Brian Lawson wrote:
>>Life is too short for the hassles of Client Access.  I have wasted days
>>(maybe 
>>weeks) of my time with Client Access.  Unless you need ODBC then use a
>Telnet 
>>Client until IBM gets it right.  If they want the AS/400 to be the "Server
>of 
>>Choice" then they have spent too long fixing this.
>
>Does anyone know if there is a way to JUST install the TN5250 part of
>CA/400?  I don't need the rest... just terminal emmulation.
>
>I'd use a simple telnet or the shareware TN5250 that I found, but I kinda
>like the way I've customized the CA emmulator.

AFAIK, you need to install the Base portion, no matter what. Contrary to
what I usually say about this kind of thing, it's one of the "benefits" of
using servers, I suppose.

You *might* try using the Graphical Access piece—no additional license.
It's "OK", but lacks the neat features of PC5250. Personally, I'd not want
to lose PC5250.

Maybe get the Personal Communications *product*, separately from CA. Anyone
used this approach?

HTH

Vernon Hamberg
Systems Software Programmer
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
400 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 371-1111 x480


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---