× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MI400
  3. August 2002

Re: MATPG corrupts data at offset X'B0' ?

From: "Simon Coulter" <shc@flybynight.com.au>

> I know that it generates declarations for EXCM that are different from
> 'standard' MI.  There are other differencecs as well but I'm starting to
> forget them because it has been over 5 years since I last wrote anything
in
> PL/MI.

Leif gave a nice bit of history about 2 months ago that mentioned PL/MI.
Back in the S/38 days, IBM programs were shipped observable and supposedly
it was possible for customers to even buy the source to CPF on microfiche
(~$1500).  Times have definitely changed.   But I've always wanted know what
PL/MI really looked like.  Is it basically PL/I with inline MI ?


Keith

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.