|
>The technical people who make the decisions at Microsoft are not >afraid to churn the design of the software they sell. And they >have shown that their way of operating is very profitable. And you want IBM to emulate Microsh*t's example?!?!? Are you nuts? I'll take iSeries stability over any cr*p M$ ships any day. The only reason M$ is profitable is that it sells patches as OS upgrades, and it has a very gullible market base that implicitly allows M$ to set standards. Should IBM follow that model? I think not. <Whoa, nelly, get off the soapbox. Slowly. ;-) > This very interesting topic is miles above my head, but I share Jon's sentiments expressed yesterday. - Dan Bale (I am *NOT* "Dale" http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
